Legal Opinion

Ammond v. Lafayette

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 20, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

63 N.J. Super. 86 (1960)

163 A.2d 721

FRED A. AMMOND, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

PAUL LAFAYETTE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 12, 1960.

Decided September 20, 1960.

Before Judges CONFORD, FOLEY and KILKENNY.

Mr. Martin J. Cohen argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Green and Yanoff, attorneys).

Mr. Sidney D. Weiss argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Mr. Robert M. Vogel, attorney).

2Per curiam

This is an appeal by leave of this court from an interlocutory order of the Law Division denying defendant's motion to set aside the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Beck v. North Packing & Provision Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dowd v. Boro Drugs, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. O'connor v. AltusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. Heinzer v. Summit Fed. S. & L. Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. Warfield v. FischerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Bridgewater Leasing Corp. v. WollmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API