Legal Opinion
Burke v. Elmendorf
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 20, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated January 20, 2005, as granted the motion of the defendants Red Oaks Mills Carpet, Inc., and Mid-Hudson Floor and Wall Co., Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the defendants Red Oaks Mills Carpet, Inc., and Mid-Hudson…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Murdza v. ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- St. Andrassy v. MooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Country-Wide Insurance v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bruno v. PrivilegiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Howard v. CodickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008