Legal Opinion
Long v. De Hanas
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided August 5, 1952No. 34777PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBingaman, J.
On'February 7, 1949, Lottie P. Long, hereinafter called plaintiff, filed a petition in the county court of Ottawa county seeking to probate a will of his deceased wife, Ruth B. DeHanas Long. The two children of Ruth B. Long, by a former husband, appeared in the county court and filed a motion to dismiss the proceeding upon the ground that all property owned by the deceased was restricted and held in trust by the Department of the Interior and that the court had no jurisdiction of the estate. The motion further stated that the will presented for probate by plaintiff had been theretofore passed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Morrison v. WorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Bowling & Miami Investment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Levindale Lead & Zinc Mining Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Long's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952