Legal Opinion

Murray v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 29, 2009No. 08-cv-2160 (LAK)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge.

Keith Murray asserts federal and state law claims of false arrest and imprisonment and malicious prosecution against his former employer, United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”). The gravamen of the complaint is that UPS instigated Murray’s allegedly false arrest and malicious prosecution by law enforcement personnel for his alleged involvement in a scheme to obtain fraudulently and sell cellular phones. 1 UPS counterclaims for breach of Murray’s duty of loyalty. The matter is before the Court on UPS’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Weyant v. OkstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Colon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Bernard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API