Miller v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of adultery; from city court of Eeidsville — Judge Collins. May 29, 1911.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
1. In a prosecution for adultery, the fact that the alleged participants were, respectively, a married man and a married woman may be shown, either directly or circumstantially. The fact of the marriage may be at least prima facie shown by any of the following methods: by proof of general repute in family (Civil Code (1910), § 5764) ; by proof of general reputation in tht; community (Drawdy v. Hesters, 130 Ga. 161 (1), 60 S. E. 451, 15 L. R. A. (N. S.) 190; Clark v. Cassidy, 62 Ga. 407; Wood v. State, 62 Ga. 406) ; by proof of the fact that the man or the woman, as the case may be, lives…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Drawdy v. HestersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Clark v. CassidySupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lefkoff v. SicroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- State v. SaykoIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Plummer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- State v. PoulosIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.