Legal Opinion

Echols v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 12, 2002No. CR 99-1060PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Damien Wayne Echols has filed a motion for continuance of the oral argument scheduled for September 19, 2002, and a motion for a stay of the proceedings on appeal pending the outcome of a petition for forensic DNA testing, currently before the Craighead County Circuit Court. After due consideration of the motions and the response from the State, we hereby grant a stay of the proceedings on appeal for a period of sixty days, to allow the trial court to consider the petition.

The procedural history of this case is quite lengthy. Echols, along with Jason Baldwin and Jessie Misskelley,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Misskelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Wooten v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robbins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Douthitt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API