Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Heald

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1960No. Docket 21, Calendar 47,988PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Presented is a question of easement by implied reservation of the right to use a 2-foot-wide sidewalk alongside plaintiff’s house.

In 1910 a Mrs. Kapp owned a parcel of city residential property. She occupied what is referred to as the old house on the west side of the parcel. In that year she built a new house, now owned by plaintiff, on the east side of the parcel and caused the above mentioned sidewalk to be laid between the 2 houses, 1 foot from the side of the new house. It was the only outdoor means of access to the new house’s coal chute, its side door leading to a stairway by which one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Rischall v. BauchmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  3. Rannels v. MarxMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Kamm v. BygraveMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. EgerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Kahn-Reiss, Inc. v. Detroit & Northern Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Tomecek v. BavasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Ketchel v. KetchelMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Appletree Mall Associates, LLC v. Ravenna Investment AssociatesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API