Legal Opinion
Dulien Steel Products Inc. of Wash. v. M/S THE OGEKA
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided September 19, 1956No. 4141PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LINDBERG, District Judge.
Defendant and cross-complainant, Skibs A/S Ogeka, claimant of the M/S Ogeka, hereinafter referred to as defendant, has applied to the court by motion for an order to vacate or modify an arbitration award under Title 9, Sections 10, 11 and 12, U.S.C.
The facts are set forth in defendant’s motion and exhibits attached thereto and the objections to said motion of plaintiff and cross-defendant (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff) and exhibits attached to said objections.
Defendant asserts in its motion that the “Arbitration Award” was the product of evident partiality…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Karppinen v. Karl Kiefer MacHine Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- James Richardson & Sons, Ltd. v. W. E. Hedger Transp. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Davy's Executors v. FawSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- The HartbridgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Arbitration between Cia De Navigacion "Julia" S.A. & P. D. Marchessini & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959