Legal Opinion
HAWKINS v. CVS PHARMACY, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 20, 2023No. 2:23-cv-03659Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROSLYN HAWKINS, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. CVS PHARMACY, INC., et al, NO. 23-cv-03659 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This negligence action arises from injuries that Plaintiff Roslyn Hawkins allegedly sustained after taking an incorrect medication dispensed by Defendants CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and CVS Health Corporation (together “CVS”). Pending is Hawkins’s motion to remand to state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). For the reasons set forth below, Hawkins’s motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND The Complaint…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Shamell Samuel-Bassett, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Hutchison Ex Rel. Hutchison v. LuddySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Savarese v. AgrissCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.