Motor Cars of Nashville, Inc. v. Chronister
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge.
11 This case involves a dispute over the attempted purchase of a car and the interpretation of District Court Rule 9. Appellant Motor Cars of Nashville, Inc., appeals the order of the Pope County Circuit Court granting appellee Chris Chronister’s motion to dismiss Motor Cars’s appeal from Pope County District Court. At issue on appeal is whether the circuit court correctly required strict compliance with District Court Rule 9, which governs appeals from district court to circuit court. We find no error and dismiss the appeal.
Chronister attempted to purchase a car…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. DawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Ingram v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Clark v. Pine Bluff Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- McNabb v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- J&M Mobile Homes, Inc. v. HamptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Spa City Lodging, LLC v. Garland County, Arkansas Garland County Board of Equalization And Shannon Sharp, in Her Official Capacity as Garland County Tax AssessorCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
- Incorporators of the Cmty. v. Pulaski Cnty.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Latham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
- Rusty L. Latham v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
- Sikora v. BogardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.