Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Latham v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 5, 2019No. CR-18-756Published

1ConcurrenceMike Murphy, Judge

"Read the dadgum statute!" So implored the late Albert Matthew Francis ("Al") Witte to the first-year, section-four law-school students circa 1983-in more colorful language. Or, as he would tenderly apply it in this case, "Read the rules. Closely." "If we interpret our rules on a case-by-case basis, being swayed by the result of our interpretation, why then do we provide these things we call rules?" Jonesboro Healthcare Ctr., LLC v. Eaton-Moery Envtl. Servs., Inc. , 2011 Ark. 501, 385 S.W.3d 797 (Danielson, J., dissenting).

For years, first under District Court Rule 9, and now pursuant to Rule…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jonesboro Healthcare Center, LLC v. Eaton-Moery Environmental Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Johnson v. DawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Ingram v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Clark v. Pine Bluff Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. J&M Mobile Homes, Inc. v. HamptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API