Legal Opinion

Long v. Todd

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1923No. 2694 1/2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). The contention presented by the proposition in appellants’ brief is that the trial court erred when he admitted the instrument in question to probate as Mrs. M. L. Waldron’s last will, because more than four years had elapsed from the date of her death before it was offered for probate, and because it was not shown, they insist, that the persons who offered the instrument were not in default in failing to present it im-próbate within four years from said date.

There was testimony that the instrument was in the possession of the witness Briggs, who wrote it,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Masterson v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Ochoa v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Elwell & Heist v. The Universalist General ConventionTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Ryan v. Texas & Pacific RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Michaelis v. NanceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kamoos v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Armstrong v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. in the Matter of the Estate of Willard O. Allen, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2013
  4. Lutz v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API