Legal Opinion

Lansden v. Hart, United States Attorney

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 11, 1950No. 9956_1PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, who are land owners and hunting club owners and operators, seek to enjoin defendants, who are federal and State law enforcement officers, from enforcing the provisions of Presidential Proclamation 2748, 61 Stat. 1089, and a proclamation of the Governor of the State of Illinois, by which proclamations an area of approximately 20,000 acres in Alexander County, Illinois, was closed to the hunting of all species of wild geese in 1947.

The State of Illinois had established a game preserve at Horseshoe Lake in Alexander County, in an area where wild geese congregate…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Thomas M. Germain, Trustee for the Estate of O'sullivan's Fuel Oil Co., Inc. v. The Connecticut National BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Alton & Southern Railway Co. v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Continental Turpentine & Rosin Co. v. Gulp Naval Stores Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Carroll v. Associated Musicians of Greater New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  5. Sickman v. United States (Two Cases). Ryal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API