Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of Mobile v. Board of Revenue & Road Com'rs

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1918No. 1 Div. 60PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; Saffold Bemey, Judge. Petition for mandamus by the State, on relation of the City of Mobile, against the Board of Revenue and Road Commissioners. Decree for defendant, and relator appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

MeCLELLAN, j.

Petition for writ of mandamus, by the state, on the relation of the city of Mobile, to require the board of revenue and road commissioners of the county of Mobile to discharge the asserted duty of that body to examine or audit certain accounts filed by the city of Mobile with the board of revenue, etc., of the county of Mobile. The duty claimed to exist, the discharge of which is sought to be compelled, is said to have been created by the act approved March 1, 1901 (Acts 1900-01, pp. 1834, 1835). The title, preamble, and sections 1 and 2 of the act read:

“An act to require the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  2. Price v. ForrestSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Bartlett v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1839
  4. Blakeney v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1837
  5. State ex rel. City of Mobile v. Board of R. & R. Com.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Newton v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Entertainment Ventures, Inc. v. BrewerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1969
  3. Ex Parte PanellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Wages v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. State ex rel. Dally v. WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API