Legal Opinion

General Electric Co. v. Brite-Lite Lamp Co.

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided July 17, 1923No. 166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

In support of its petition for a preliminary injunction against infringement of the Gangmuir patent, No. 1,-180,159, dated April 18, 1916, for “incandescent electric lamp,” known as the “gas-filled lamp” patent, the following cases in which, as plaintiff, the General Electric Company has secured adjudications of the validity of the patent, are cited: G. E. Co. v. Nitro-Tungsten Lamp Co. (D. C., Southern District of New York) 261 Fed. 606, (U. S. Circuit Ct. of Appeals, 2d Cir.) 266 Fed. 994; G. E. Co. v. Alexander et al. (D. C., Southern District of New York); 277 Fed.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. General Electric Co. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. General Electric Co. v. Continental Lamp Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  4. General Electric Co. v. Nitro Tungsten Lamp Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  5. General Electric Co. v. AlexanderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Minneapolis Electric Lamp Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1924
  2. Hilditch v. American Bumper CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1926
  3. Desmond Incandescent Lamp Co. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API