Legal Opinion

State v. Pete

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1966No. 673PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIMOND, Justice.

In the district court1 a jury found appel-lee guilty of the crime of selling intoxicating liquor without a license. The superior court set aside the judgment of conviction. The state has appealed. We reverse the decision of the superior court.

This case was initiated in the city of Barrow when verified complaints were filed' by a state police officer charging appellee-with having sold liquor unlawfully to Edward M. Sigvayugak and Clyde T. Numnik. Appellee was granted a change of venue to. the city of Fairbanks. A few days prior to, trial the district attorney substituted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Patmore v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  4. The PEOPLE v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State v. SheltonAlaska Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. WorthamAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hunter v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Mutschler v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API