Legal Opinion

O'Hara v. Morris Fruit & Produce Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1938No. Nos. 31,839, 31,841PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Such a small, flimsy thing as a summer visor cap, accidentally dropped or intentionally thrown by its owner upon the public sidewalk abutting the store leased to defendant, in the hands of an energetic and plausible lawyer, produced verdicts aggregating $4,305.17 for plaintiffs. Defendant’s motions for judgments notwithstanding the verdicts or a new trial were denied, and it appeals.

The short facts are: Defendant is in the business its name implies in a building leased to it, fronting Sixth street north, Minneapolis, next to that occupied by the O’Hara Fruit Company, where…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Taylor v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Moore v. . GadsdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Abar v. Ramsey Motor Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Isham v. BroderickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freeman v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Shepstedt v. HayesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Sternitzke v. Donahue's JewelersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Bergum v. PalmborgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API