Legal Opinion

Giorgio v. Synergy Management Group CA2/5

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 2014No. B248752UnpublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KRIEGLER, J.

In this intentional tort action, the trial court denied defendant John Giorgio’s motion, made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 473, subdivision (d), 1 to set aside the entry of default and any subsequent default judgment, in favor of plaintiff Synergy Management Group, LLC (Synergy). Giorgio contends on appeal that the court erred in denying the motion because he was never properly served with either the original or the first amended complaint. We affirm.

STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURE

On May 6, 2011, Synergy, on behalf of its predecessor in interest ASI Management, LLC,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cruz v. Fagor America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Hearn v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. August Home, Inc. v. SHOPRIME Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
  2. Bhs Law LLP v. Worldex Industry and Trading Co., Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
  3. Chinese Theater, LLC v. Starline Tours USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. Indian Hills Holdings, LLC v. FryeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  5. Langer v. US Green Energy Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API