Smith v. Kowalski
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The trial court granted summary disposition for defendants, 1 finding that no special relationship existed between plaintiff and any of the defendants to obviate the “public-duty” doctrine. The trial court further found that none of defendants’ actions or omissions, if proved, constituted gross negligence so as to overcome governmental immunity. The trial court also concluded that plaintiff’s accident was not foreseeable.
Plaintiff appeals as of right from the order granting defendants summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). We affirm.
Plaintiff, an inmate at Lakeland Correctional…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- White v. BeasleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Harrison v. Director of Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Energy Reserves, Inc. v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Eason v. Coggins Memorial Christian Methodist Episcopal ChurchMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Marilyn Froling Revocable Living Trust v. Bloomfield Hills Country ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Ardt v. Titan InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Lela Tompkins v. Crown Corr, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Plunkett v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Reeves v. Kmart Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.