Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Vernon Dutkel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 17, 1999No. 98-55338PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge KOZINSKI; Concurrence by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:

Because impartial jurors are the cornerstone of our system of justice and central to the Sixth Amendment’s promise of a fair trial, we “guard jealously the sanctity of the jury’s right to operate as freely as possible from outside unauthorized intrusions purposefully made.” Remmer v. United States, 350 U.S. 377, 382, 76 S.Ct. 425, 100 L.Ed. 435 (1956) (Remmer II). In Michael Dutkel’s case, we didn’t guard the jury jealously enough. During a joint trial on drug conspiracy and distribution charges, Dutkel’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. John Whitehead v. Roger D. Cowan, Warden, Menard Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. People v. WardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Stouffer v. TrammellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  5. Cook v. LaMarqueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API