Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hughes

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 20, 1909No. 176PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Applicant was adjudged by the district judge guilty of contempt of court for failing to answer certain questions before the grand jury.

The agreed statement of facts and the decree of the court adjudicating the facts and reasons for adjudging applicant in contempt are set forth in the record. The judgment of the court was entered on July 13, 1909; and recites that on a former day. of the court, to wit: the day previous, the grand jury came into court bringing applicant with them, and reported to the court in writing that applicant had been summoned’ and sworn as a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ParkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Ex Parte Sauls and AndrewsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fleishman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of World v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Ex Parte SanchezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of World v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API