Williams v. Dennison
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
This is an action for money had and received. The complaint was filed September 12, 1889, and it alleged that the money sued for — $1,131.73 — was received by the defendant for the use and benefit of the plaintiff on the twenty-eighth day of October, 1887, *541at the city and. county of San Francisco. The answer denied all the material averments of the complaint, and alleged that the cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations. The case was tried before a jury, and the verdict and judgment were in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $581.67. From this judgment, and an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Colton Land & Water Co. v. RaynorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Curtiss v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Sterling v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Foster v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Alspaugh v. ReidIdaho Supreme Court · 1898
- Fulton v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940