Legal Opinion

49er Chevrolet v. New Motor Vehicle Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1978No. Civ. No. 17083PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*87Opinion

PARAS, Acting P. J.

With a perversity born of adversity, 49er Chevrolet (49er), an automobile dealer, has tried over the past four years to avoid a decision of this case on its merits. (See 49er Chevrolet v. Office of Administrative Procedure (Apr. 1, 1977) 3 Civ. 15927 [unpub. opn.].) Even in this appeal in which the merits are finally before us, 49er manages to conceal its most potent arguments in a blizzard of constitutional mutterings about the contract clause. It need not have labored so mightily, for on the merits 49er will prevail.

49er appeals from a judgment of the Sacramento…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Borror v. Department of InvestmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Schomig v. KeiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Cleveland Chiropractic College v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Barron v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Ford v. New Car Dealers Policy & Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. People v. MillarAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API