49er Chevrolet v. New Motor Vehicle Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*87Opinion
PARAS, Acting P. J.
With a perversity born of adversity, 49er Chevrolet (49er), an automobile dealer, has tried over the past four years to avoid a decision of this case on its merits. (See 49er Chevrolet v. Office of Administrative Procedure (Apr. 1, 1977) 3 Civ. 15927 [unpub. opn.].) Even in this appeal in which the merits are finally before us, 49er manages to conceal its most potent arguments in a blizzard of constitutional mutterings about the contract clause. It need not have labored so mightily, for on the merits 49er will prevail.
49er appeals from a judgment of the Sacramento…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Borror v. Department of InvestmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Schomig v. KeiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Cleveland Chiropractic College v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Barron v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Ford v. New Car Dealers Policy & Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. MillarAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1979