Legal Opinion

Groesbeck v. Mattison

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action to foreclose a mortgage, brought in the district court for Hennepin county against Cora B. Mattison and husband, the mortgagors, and Peter T. Waters, and tried by Rea, J., who ordered judgment. for defendants, which was entered, and the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell. J.

The contest in this case was a triangular one. The defendants Mattisons and the defendant Waters each interposed a several answer to the complaint; the defendants Mattisons also alleging matters as a basis for affirmative relief against their codefendant, Waters, and to which Waters interposed a reply. The plaintiff interposed replies to the several answers of the defendants. The defendants each made a motion for judgment against plaintiff on the pleadings, which the court granted, and from that judgment plaintiff appeals. Therefore the only question involved in this appeal is…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Interstate Land & I. Co. v. LoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Jefferson County Bank v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. WimmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Howard v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Minneapolis Investment Co. v. National Security Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API