Aspen Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Zedan
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Chief Judge.
In this action concerning unpaid invoices for the delivery and sale of gas, defendants, Manal Zedan, Mahur Zuma Huer Al Duien, and B-Twins Corp., appeal from the trial court’s entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff, Aspen Petroleum Products, Inc. The issue on appeal is the binding effect of a request for admission on the requesting party. We conclude that the requesting party is not bound, and therefore, we affirm.
Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 36, plaintiff sent requests for admission to defendants. One request (the zero balance request) stated:
Please admit that, prior to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Poulsen v. RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Christensen v. HooverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Benton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Conrad v. ImataniColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Friends of the Black Forest Regional Park, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walker v. Van LaninghamColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Whitney Morris v. Real Estate Expert Advisors, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020