Legal Opinion

Aspen Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Zedan

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 2005No. 04CA0426PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Chief Judge.

In this action concerning unpaid invoices for the delivery and sale of gas, defendants, Manal Zedan, Mahur Zuma Huer Al Duien, and B-Twins Corp., appeal from the trial court’s entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff, Aspen Petroleum Products, Inc. The issue on appeal is the binding effect of a request for admission on the requesting party. We conclude that the requesting party is not bound, and therefore, we affirm.

Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 36, plaintiff sent requests for admission to defendants. One request (the zero balance request) stated:

Please admit that, prior to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Poulsen v. RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Christensen v. HooverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. Benton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Conrad v. ImataniColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Friends of the Black Forest Regional Park, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walker v. Van LaninghamColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Whitney Morris v. Real Estate Expert Advisors, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API