Legal Opinion

Cosey v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided September 30, 2012No. 1:11-cv-00121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Beth A. Cosey (“Cosey”) brings this action for short-term disability (“STD”) and long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits. Cosey and Defendants, The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”) and bioMerieux, Inc. (“bioMerieux”), have cross-moved for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (Docs. 24, 25.) For the reasons set forth below, Cosey’s motion will be denied, and Defendants’ motion will be granted.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Cosey’s Employment and Benefits Claims

Cosey was employed for some…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clean Burn Fuels, LLC v. Purdue BioEnergy, LLC (In re Clean Burn Fuels, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API