Legal Opinion

Kimble v. Kiser

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 13, 1932No. 3260PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL, District Judge.

The appellees instituted this action for damages for breach of a contract involving the sale of certain cattle; the proceeding was by notice of motion for judgment (under the West Virginia statute [Code AV. Va. 1931, 56-2-6]), and upon trial a verdict was rendered and judgment entered* thereon in favor of the appellees in the sum of $4,964.14. The parlies will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants, as they appeared in the trial court.

The notice of motion sets forth in substance: That the plaintiffs (Kiser & Hammer) had on October 23, 1929, entered into a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Charles MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. State v. CobbsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State v. KinneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. State v. CatlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1831

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Twachtman v. ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  2. Deutser v. Marlboro Shirt Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  3. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Sun Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  4. Peterson v. SheridanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API