Legal Opinion

Nance v. Piano Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1913PublishedCited by 14 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Appeal from Circuit Court, Shelby County. — H. W. Lattghlin, Jndge.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Jnstiee Lansdbn

delivered the opinion of the Conrt.

This is an action of replevin, bronght by the piano company, as plaintiff below, to recover from Mrs. Nance a certain piano, which it claimed as the conditional vendor of the piano to one Ives.

The piano company sold a piano to Ives in February, 1906, at the price of $385, $10' of which was paid in cash and $43 was paid by the piano company taking another piano in exchange. The balance of $332 and interest was to be paid at the rate of $6 per month, and title to the piano was to remain in the piano company .until the whole price was fully…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Harbison v. Knoxville Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Southern Ice & Coal Co. v. AlleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Waters Co. v. . GerardNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. McGhee v. EdwardsTennessee Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Scott v. Nashville Bridge Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Charles Culbertson and Helen Culbertson, His Wife v. Alice LelandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Roberts v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  4. Arutanoff v. Metropolitan GovernmentTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Robinson Bros. Motor Co. v. KnightTennessee Supreme Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API