Legal Opinion

Peabody Painting & Waterproofing, Inc. v. Kentucky Employers' Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 29, 2010No. 2008-CA-001914-MR, 2008-CA-001971-MR, 2008-CA-001940-MRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge:

This case involves a workers’ compensation insurance coverage claim between Peabody Painting & Waterproofing, Inc. and Kentucky Employers’ Mutual Insurance Company (KEMI), and Fusting Insurance Agency’s claim that it is entitled to indemnity from KEMI.

The Jefferson Circuit Court granted KEMI’s motion for summary judgment on the basis that the KEMI policy did not provide extraterritorial coverage for a Peabody employee injured in Louisiana. It subsequently denied summary judgment to Fusting Insurance Agency, finding that material issues of fact existed as to wheth er the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cinelli v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998
  2. Carnes v. CarnesKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985
  4. Glens Falls Insurance Company v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Woodard v. Calvert Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coleman v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2012
  2. Kentucky Employers' Mutual Insurance v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API