Legal Opinion

Southern Ry. Co. v. Dear

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1935No. 7 Div. 136PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

W. H. Dear, plaintiff, brought his action for personal injury and property damage .against appellant to recover the sum of $2,500, alleged to be due as damages sustained by plaintiff, as the proximate result of the negligent operation of a passenger train by the servants, agents, or employees ■of the defendant, while acting within the line and scope of their employment, at a public highway crossing near Weaver Station in said county on February 18, 1934. The trial resulted in a judgment for plaintiff for the sum of $500, and costs of said suit. The defendant filed its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. FosheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. L. & N. R. R. v. CalvertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Mobile Light R. Co. v. GadikSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Hatfield v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Shine v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. H & P, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. GriffithAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API