Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. City of Birmingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1940No. 6 Div. 665PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Judge-

The sole question presented by this appeal relates to the action of the trial court in granting the appellee’s (plaintiff below) motion for a new trial.

Appellant, having been convicted in the-recorder’s court for violation of an ordinance of appellee city, appealed to the-circuit court where trial again proceeded. There, a verdict of not guilty was returned. In so far as is shown by the record, the: appellant’s defense, an alibi, was first disclosed in the circuit court pending trial after the appellee had rested its • case. This alibi was to the effect that, at the time of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Parker v. Hayes Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Dennis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dossey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  2. Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  3. Ex Parte BrandonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Borden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  5. Kent v. LindseyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API