Legal Opinion

Cohen v. A. M. Byers Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 23, 1950No. Appeal, No. 63PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the decree refusing a motion for a preliminary injunction. This Court said in Murray v. Hill, 359 Pa. 540, 541, 59 A. 2d 877, that: “ Our uniform rule is that, on an appeal from a decree which refuses, grants or continues a preliminary injunction, we will look only to see if there were any apparently *619reasonable grounds for tbe action of the court below, and we will not further consider the merits of the case or pass upon the reasons for or against such action, unless it is plain that no such grounds existed or that the rules of law relied on are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murray v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lindenfelser v. LindenfelserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Keystone Guild, Inc. v. PappasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Parker v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Roth v. Columbia Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Summit Township v. FennellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API