Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Dietter
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 9, 1945No. Civ. A. No. 1312PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
This is an action by the plaintiff as Price Administrator seeking to enjoin violations of the Maximum Price Regulations and General Order No. 51, and for other relief. It is before the Court at this time on hearing on a motion for preliminary injunction.
The defendant is the owner of a retail grocery and meat market managed by her husband and son. The plaintiff sent two investigators to go over the records of the defendant to ascertain whether there had been violation of the Maximum Price Regulations applying to the various products sold in the defendant’s market. Going…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Brown v. Cummins Distilleries CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1944
- Brown v. W. R. McNeil, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1943
3Cited by3 opinions
- Haines v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Porter v. HaldasDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1946
- Porter v. LajeunesseDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1946