Legal Opinion

Haines v. Porter

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 25, 1946No. 9241PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This appeal is from a decree for an injunction and treble damages founded upon the sale of appellant’s automobile above a ceiling price fixed pursuant to the Emergency Price Control Act. 56 Stat. 33, §: 205(a) and (e), as amended, 58 Stat. 640,. 50 U.S.C.A.War Appendix, § 925(a) and. (e). Appellant is a dealer in automobiles. It is not disputed that he owned the automobile and that it was willfully sold by his regular salesman at a price above the-ceiling. Appellant denies that he personally participated in the violation of the Act and attacks the evidence which tended to show that he did so.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Di Melia v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
  2. Jung v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  3. Talbert v. SimsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  4. Carter v. BowlesDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1944
  5. Bowles v. Lee's Ice Cream, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vicknair v. BonnevalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API