Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shephard v. Van Doren

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1936No. 4068Published

1DissentHudspeth, Justice

The defendant in this case throughout the trial maintained that Leo Parks bought an engine numbered 1392476 from O. B. Thompson and had that placed in the Chevrolet car involved in this case. The counsel for the defendant-appellant, while Carl A. Johnson was on the stand, stated: (Tr. 117) -“If the court please Mr. Johnson is the man who bought this car and sold it to Mr. Van Doren, and he is the man that will have to pay Mr. Van Doren for the value of it.”

Johnson testified: “There wasn’t any changed numbers on the car; here’s the motor he bought and put in there,” and that he knew Leo Parks,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barrett v. FischSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  2. James v. Board of CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Stickney v. Dunaway & LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Valley Securities Co. v. De RousselLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Daily v. FitzgeraldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API