Legal Opinion

Newton v. Spence

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 13, 1974No. 236, September Term, 1973PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Appellant, a former part-time employee of Sears Roebuck & Co. (Sears), was awarded conpensatory and punitive damages aggregating $42,500 after a jury trial under a five-count declaration alleging assault and battery, false arrest, false imprisonment, slander and malicious prosecution. The granting of Sears’ motions for judgments n.o.v. reduced appellant’s recovery to $11,500. Here he seeks primarily the restoration of the difference of $31,000, representing punitive damages against Sears for $6,000 under Count IV (slander) and $25,000 under Count V (malicious prosecution).

We conclude that…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. BarrackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Smith v. BernfeldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. Siegman v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Drug Fair of Maryland, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Banks v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Alleco Inc. v. Harry & Jeanette Weinberg Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Montgomery Ward v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. McHale v. W.B.S. Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Powers v. CarvalhoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API