Legal Opinion

Golding v. . Foster

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 24, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

Plaintiff, a resident of Carteret County, brings this action against Foster & Oaviness, partners, doing business in the city of Greensboro, N. 0., to recover the value of 150 barrels of sweet potatoes shipped by plaintiff to defendants on 10 February, 1923.

After exchanging telegrams relative to the price of Porto Rico potatoes for prompt shipment, the defendants, on 2 February, sent the plaintiff the following message: “Ship hundred fifty barrels Porto Ricos today. Wire car number.” In reply to this order, plaintiff answered on the same day: “Will ship Monday.” The potatoes were not shipped…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rucker v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Crook v. CowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  3. Cozart v. . HerndonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. T. C. May Co. v. Menzies Shoe Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Green v. A. F. Messick Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elliott Building Co. v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API