Legal Opinion
Blair Foods, Inc. v. Ranchers Cotton Oil
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 2, 1980No. 77-3439PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge:
Appellant Blair Foods, Inc., (“Blair”) brought this private antitrust action under Section Four of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15, seeking treble damages. Blair charged appellees Glen-Webb & Company of San Francisco, Inc., (“Glen-Webb”), Ranchers Cotton Oil (“Ranchers”), and William A. Burns, Vice President of Ranchers, with conspiracy in violation of Section One of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and appellee Glen-Webb with an attempt to monopolize in violation of Section Two of that Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2. The United States District Court for the Northern District of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Paul Lessig v. Tidewater Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Natural Beverage Distributors, D/B/A Mendocino Coast Distributing Co. Florence M. BeardsleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Valley Liquors, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Renfield Importers, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Ragu Foods, Inc. And Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.