Legal Opinion

Van Pilsum v. Iowa State University of Science & Technology

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided December 3, 1993No. 4-92-CV-70619PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*180ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL, MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES, AND SETTING TRIAL

BREMER, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Compel and for Sanctions (# 13) filed October 29, 1993, which is orally resisted, and Plaintiffs resisted motion to extend scheduling deadlines (# 15) filed November 1, 1993. Hearing on the motions was held December 2,1993. Appearing were John Barrett for Plaintiff and Steve Young for Defendants.

Based upon arguments of counsel and a review of the file the Court FINDS:

1. Motion to Extend Deadlines: This motion is granted, as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hall v. Clifton PrecisionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bennie Kennedy v. Schneider ElectricCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Calzaturficio S.C.A.R.P.A. S.P.A. V. Fabiano Shoe Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  3. Peter v. Progressive Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Security National Bank v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2014
  5. Menuskin v. WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API