Legal Opinion
People v. Crawford
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 16, 1979PublishedCited by 1,560 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This appeal presents us with the opportunity to accept the suggestion of the Court of Appeals to review our procedure for handling criminal appeals which assigned counsel decides are "wholly frivolous” (see People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). In the past we have followed the guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court in Anders v California (386 US 738; see People v Ferge, 67 AD2d 832; People v Miller, 64 AD2d 1030). We are *39satisfied that the interests of indigent defendants generally are protected by that procedure and that assigned counsel has observed it in this case. For…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- People v. FergeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
4Cited by1,560 opinions
- People v. CruwysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. VasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. BeatyNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. EspinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
1,555 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.