Fitzpatrick v. Newland
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered November £5, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
— The plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant the sum of $1,500, as the purchase price of a crop, claimed to have been sold by the plaintiff to the defendant. *402Verdict and judgment being rendered in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant has appealed.
The only question presented, which we regard as calling for serious consideration, is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment. We find in the record ample evidence, if believed by the jury, to support the conclusion reached by it, though there is serious conflict in the evidence. This prevents our…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sholin v. Skamania Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Knapp v. Order of PendoWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Edwards v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Warwick v. HitchingsWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Pachko v. Wilkeson Coal & Coke Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Innes v. HayWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
- Parker v. Washington Tug & Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915