Legal Opinion

Parker v. Washington Tug & Barge Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1915No. 12229PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered November 10, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for damages.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The purpose of this action was to recover damages sustained by a scow or barge while in the possession of the defendant. After the issues were framed, the cause was tried to the court and a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s testimony, the defendant interposed a motion for a non-suit, which was overruled. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the defendant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence *577to sustain a verdict, and moved the court for a directed verdict. Neither the challenge to the evidence nor the motion for a directed verdict were sustained. The jury returned a verdict…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Wenatchee Canning Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Terry & Tench Co. v. Merritt & Chapman Derrick & Wrecking Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  3. Beach v. . Raritan Delaware Bay R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Ryan v. LambertWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Swenson v. Snare & Triest Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chaloupka v. CyrWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Butzbach v. SiriNevada Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Donaldson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Gray v. HickeyWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Sprague v. Snug Harbor Marina, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API