Legal Opinion

Nall v. City of Elizabeth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 2, 1923PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*322Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

J. F. Nall, a ctitzen and taxpayer of Elizabethtown, a .city of the fifth class, brought this suit to enjoin the city and its officers from issuing bonds in the sum of $30,-000.00 for the purpose of constructing a filtration plant and improving its waterworks system. Being denied the relief prayed for, he appeals.

The grounds on wihich the validity of the bonds is assailed are: (1) The proposition was not carried by the requisite vote; (2) under section 157 of the Constitution a city of the fifth class cannot exceed the rate of seventy-five cents on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Montgomery County Fiscal Court v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  2. City of Winchester v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Belknap v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  4. Fowler v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Ballard v. City of ShelbyvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. City of CorbinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  2. McNichols v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  3. Hitchins v. Mayor of CumberlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Masonic Widows' & Orphans' Home v. City of CorbinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Perl-Mack Civic Ass'n v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API