Legal Opinion
Alder v. Correctional Medical Services
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 27, 2003No. 02-2496PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Pro se Michigan prisoner Matthew Lome Alder appeals a district court judgment that dismissed his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
On March 18, 2002, Alder filed his complaint against Correctional Medical Services (“CMS”), Gregory Naylor, Paul Harvey, R. Mooney, M. Bell, M. Belcher, Jeane-Marie King, John and Jane Does, and Susan DeBruyn. The complaint raises claims of Eighth Amendment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Darryl McGore v. Gene L. Wrigglesworth, Chief Sheriff Richard Chinelli, Administrator Ingham County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Shehee v. LuttrellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Browning v. PennertonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2009
- Sherley v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
- Adkins v. JordanDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Alder v. Correctional Medical ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Anderson v. ClarkeDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2024
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.