Legal Opinion

Esquibel v. Hallmark

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1978No. 11474PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEDERICI, Justice.

This action was commenced to quiet title to lands claimed by plaintiffs Esquibel (appellants). Following a non-jury trial, title was quieted in appellants against all defendants except Lavadie and Santistevan (appellees). Appellants seek review of the judgment of the District Court of Mora County.

The subject property was originally a part of the Mora Grant. Subsequently, title was acquired by the common grantor, State Investment Company, and later was sold to all of the predecessors of all of the present parties. Appellants’ claim to title is based on a series of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marquez v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Birtrong v. Coronado Building Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Flores v. BruesselbachCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  4. Platt v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Velasquez v. CoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pacheco v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Lopez v. AdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Sanchez v. SaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. PedroncelliNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Blumenthal v. Concrete Constructors Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API