Legal Opinion

Tate v. Field

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 14, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported in 12 Dick. Ch. Rep. 53.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gummere, J.

The bill in this case was filed to foreclose a mortgage given by a corporation, the Powerville Eelt Roofing Company, to the complainant, on property near Chatham, in Morris county. It alleges that the mortgaged premises were conveyed by Goodell, receiver of the Powerville Eelt Roofing Company, to Gerrit ¡Smith, who acted as the agent or attorney of Eield, Haynes and White; that Smith, Eield, Haynes and White tore down a building which had been erected on the mortgaged premises, and removed it to premises owned by them near Boonton, and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cottle v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Citizens Trust Co. v. PaoliNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  3. Camden Trust Co. v. HandleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
  4. Laurie v. RyanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
  5. MCCORMICK 106, LLC VS. SANDRA J. MAY (L-1544-16, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API