Legal Opinion
People v. Hanggi
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided May 8, 1968No. Crim. A. No. 13120PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A municipal court jury found defendant guilty of the misdemeanor of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (Veh. Code, § 23102). On this appeal he contends:
1. There was an insufficiency of the evidence to warrant a finding of guilty by the jury;
2. That the extrajudicial statements made by the defendant were admitted into evidence without the establishment of a corpus delicti; and
3. That the court allowed the results of a blood test to be admitted in evidence even though the defendant was not offered a choice of chemical tests under Vehicle Code section 13353.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People v. SudduthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. MehaffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. BrannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. FiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Stenzel v. State, Department of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Padilla v. MeeseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.