Commonwealth v. Woods

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

This appeal arises from appellant Kenneth Woods’ conviction, following a non-jury trial, of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance.1 Appellant now contends that certain evidence seized as a result of a warrantless search of his automobile should have been suppressed because he did not voluntarily consent to the search.

A few days prior to April 12, 1974, Officer Bernard Ciganek of the Pittsburgh Police Department received *74reliable information that there was marijuana and dangerous drugs in the appellant’s apartment. Pursuant to this information Officer…