Sanford v. Ainsa
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
This was a suit to recover possession of land conveyed by the father of the appellants to them, pending a prior suit prosecuted by the appellee to quiet title in a tract of which this land was part. Richardson v. Ainsa, 218 U. S. 289. The plaintiff (appellee) got a judgment for possession and damages and the defendant took the case to the Supreme Court of the Territory.
The errors assigned before that court seem to have been first, the refusal of the court below to strike out a paragraph of the complaint that set up the decree in the former suit, the defendant contending that it appeared on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gray v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Richardson v. AinsaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Armijo v. ArmijoSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Nielsen v. SteinfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
3Cited by3 opinions
- Phoenix Railway Co. v. LandisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Thornburg v. FryeArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Schaefer v. DuhameArizona Supreme Court · 1947