Legal Opinion

United States v. Ruth M. Anderson

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 6, 1983No. 82-5410PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents the question whether, in a criminal case, reversal is required when a district court fails to conduct a colloquy with a defendant before accepting a written waiver of her right to a jury trial. We conclude that under the circumstances present here reversal is neither mandatory nor appropriate, and therefore affirm the conviction.

A

Ruth Anderson, the defendant, was indicted on two counts of wilful and intentional tax evasion. Anderson signed a form waiving her right to a trial by jury, to which the government and the district court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. Manuel DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. James ScottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. LillyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. David CochranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API