United States v. Ruth M. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents the question whether, in a criminal case, reversal is required when a district court fails to conduct a colloquy with a defendant before accepting a written waiver of her right to a jury trial. We conclude that under the circumstances present here reversal is neither mandatory nor appropriate, and therefore affirm the conviction.
A
Ruth Anderson, the defendant, was indicted on two counts of wilful and intentional tax evasion. Anderson signed a form waiving her right to a trial by jury, to which the government and the district court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Manuel DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. James ScottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. LillyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. David CochranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.